Ian Jukes: Learning in the New Digital Landscape
Digital kids in the New Digital Landscape. A key theme of this presentation is that the digital life children experience today provides digital learning experiences (almost always separate from the formal education experience) that result in different patterns of cognitive development than "digital immigrants" from older generations might have. Jukes says that greater visual memory is one possible result. He cites research I am not familiar with that includes fMRI studies showing slightly different patterns of activation between digital natives and digital immigrants.
Ian Jukes recommends Johnson's Everything Bad is Good for You (noted in his last session) and Daniel Pink's A Whole New Mind : Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future.
Gaming is a major aspect of many students' experiences. Will digital kids have spent more time by 21 years of age gaming than reading books or sitting in class? And what are the implications? For society? For schools? For our children?
Jukes reminds us of the value of useful failure, practice, and repeated feedback in the learning process. Are these more present in traditional forms of instruction or in games. He references the The impact of media and technology in schools: A research report prepared for The Bertelsmann Foundation, a study from the late 1990's. One of the findings was that while traditional instruction and technology/media infused instruction might have similar initial results on achievement tests, retesting one year later indicated that most of the content delivered via a traditional model was not retained, but that most of the content delivered using media and technology infused instruction was. It's not the case that basic skills and integrated project based learning are mutually exclusive.
Jukes closed by reminding everyone that aligning instructional practices with the needs of digital natives should matter to all of us. Children may be 20% of the population, but they are 100% of our future. No matter how attached we are to the past, real or imagined, we should recognized that schools the way they used to be may not be effective in preparing students for the world to come. The last metaphor Jukes leaves us with is the comparison of how a blue whale turns (hint, slowly over a long stretch) vs. a large school of sardines (fast, tight radius). It happens because a few individuals in the school shift in a new direction, creating some dissonance until the school turns. He notes, hopefully, that we have seen social changes toward tobacco in a generation or two. The Berlin Wall fell suddenly.
He quoted Hellen Keller, noting that the only thing worse than not being able to see is being able to see and having no vision.
Change, Jukes reminds, is possible. But who, when, and where?